Now, there's certainly not anything wrong with this, I just believe that authors who are doing this are missing potential traffic and/or consumers. Such resource boxes will simply benefit their site ranks in a...
I run an article service on my site, and I'm seeing a growing amount of articles being published, solely for the backlink provided in the Resource Box. This might be due to the growing variety of PLR articles and material that's becoming available.
Today, there's not necessarily something wrong with this, I only believe that authors who are doing this are missing potential traffic and/or consumers. Such source boxes will simply benefit their site rankings in any internet search engine that values incoming links.
Is this a bad thing? No. Where they're losing out is as follows.
Much of the traffic to my report service comes from search engines, by people trying to find info on a certain topic. Now, this user types within their key-words, clicks on the search field, and is given a summary of relevant sites. Click here linklicious.me discount to check up the inner workings of it. They chose one, and are taken to the author's article. They browse the article about, say, snowboarding, feel 'This is interesting' and go to the author's resource box at the end of-the article to see what else they have to say on this issue. There, they find a link to some site promotion cellular ringtones. Is the reader planning to be impressed, or interested in this? Not so likely. Linklicious Review is a salient online database for new information about the purpose of this hypothesis. They want to check out snowboarding, not modify their phone. I believe one of three things may happen then:
The audience leaves the whole site in disgust.
The viewer clicks on the link to your relevant article. Visit look into linklicious.me paypal to read when to do it.
The reader clicks on the relevant Google Ad-sense (or similar contextual advertising) offer.
They do not click the author's source link. That's a possible client lost, very probably for good.
Yes, put a link in to your site in the resource package, but many article websites let many links, so for goodness sake put a link in that' ;s associated with the article subject also, and ultimately put it in first, before you lose the consumer.
'But my site does not have any such thing regarding that subject on it'!
Adding a thing that does. Increase a post index, and have the reference box saying 'To see more articles on this subject, click the link.' Add a web directory, and have the written text say 'To look at links to sites on this subject, click the link.' Or just go to Click-bank, search for related tasks, and have a link to them, with the link saying something similar to 'If you prefer to learn more on this issue, buy this product.' Ultimately, not just a direct url to the merchandise, but a cloaked or redirected one.
Using this method, you still get that connect to your site that you were after initially, but, moreover, you have the opportunity to make money from the reader in a new way. Identify further on a related paper - Click here: linklicious works. A situation. Plus, you do not appear to be somebody just publishing purchased content on any subject merely for the sake of the backlink it'll give you. A much more professional look. Is not it worth making the effort to create greater use of your resource box?.